San Francisco Rental Income – Tax Implications

Filed in CPA Blog by on October 23, 2012
Tags: , , ,

Rental real estate in San Francisco offers tremendous tax advantages and opportunity for tax planning. Taxpayers, such as you, can depreciate property far exceeding your actual investment, deduct interest on borrowed capital, exchange rather than sell properties to defer tax on gains, use installment sales to defer tax on sales, and profit from preferential rates on long-term capital gains. Most importantly, you can generate “positive cash flow,” or monthly income, with depreciation deductions that effectively turn the actual income into tax losses.

San Francisco Real Estate and Tax ImplicationsSan Francisco clearly is recovering as a real estate market – making rental income even more lucrative.  In some cases, you can make money on rentals and be prepared for a possible return to positive growth in the San Francisco rental market.  While we are not experts on real estate, nor can we predict the future of any investment, as a leading San Francisco CPA Firm, we at Safe Harbor CPAs can help you mitigate any tax implications from San Francisco real estate.

More on San Francisco Rental Income

However, deductions are not unlimited. For example, real estate income and loss is generally considered passive income and loss for tax purposes. Taxpayers generally cannot use passive activity losses (PALs) to offset ordinary income from employment, self-employment, interest and dividends, or pensions and annuities. The rental real estate loss allowance and real estate professional status are two important exceptions to this rule. In addition, the tax consequences of renting out a vacation home depend upon the amount of time the home is rented and the amount of time you use the home for personal purposes.

As one exception to the PAL rules, taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes of $150,000 or less can claim a rental real estate loss allowance of up to $25,000 for property they actively manage. Active management does not require regular, continuous, or substantial involvement. However, it does require that the taxpayer own at least 10% of the property. Also, to qualify for the exception, married taxpayers must file jointly.

The second exception allows real estate professionals not to treat their rental activity as a passive activity. Therefore, their losses are not limited to passive income. This exception requires material participation by the taxpayer which is demonstrated by meeting one of seven tests. These tests are complex and include the number of hours of participation and the facts and circumstances of the participation in the activity.

Vacation homes are taxed under one of three sets of rules depending on how long the homeowner rents the property. Many San Francisco residents have vacation homes at Lake Tahoe, in Las Vegas, in Los Angeles or elsewhere.  Alternatively, many residents abroad have vacation homes in San Francisco – in either scenario, you want to plan how you mitigate the tax implications of a San Francisco vacation home.

If you rent your vacation home for fewer than 15 days during the year, no rental income is includible in gross income. If you rent the property for 15 or more days during the tax year and it is used by you for the greater of (a) more than 14 days or (b) more than 10% of the number of days during the year for which the home is rented, the rental deductions are limited. Under this limitation, the amount of the rental activity deductions may not exceed the amount by which the gross income derived from such activity exceeds the deductions otherwise allowable for the property, such as interest and taxes.

Tax Planning for San Francisco Landlords and Real Estate Investors

If you have any questions as to how the rental real estate rules apply to your particular situation, please do not hesitate to call for an appointment. We can assist you in taking advantage of the available tax benefits and develop an overall tax plan.

Comments are closed.